I’m Not Really a Lumberjack and I’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back
Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence took place in a town bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some unsuspecting slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all the time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He’s a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this will be one worker who keeps his own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very man that is quiet. He just wandered in really calmly by having an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been several customers by them at the time plus they had been terrified,’ he included.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is just a bit more frightening, as the axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a person in the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant using the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ as well as the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.
Whose Casino Is It Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate choice is regarding the idea that neighboring communities would be affected by casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of prospects who have suggested that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to your proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley claims that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it could have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley stated during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power over the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
No matter if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the big donation from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I understand there was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with gambling shops and payday loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared for a Technicality
But, fighting back in the corner of the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance utilizing the guidelines and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no longer mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a completely innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are looking to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this type of hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ reported Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season their office had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.